Rights And Obligations

Running Head : RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONSThe Reluctant bail Guard[Name][University]The Reluctant security measure GuardIf you would look closely to the case and try to deeply pogey out the core of the deeds of David tuff , it surfaces that the conflict root from the contrasting rules of the bon ton policies and the rules from the Security Officer s Manual as promulgated by the Superintendent of Police . Tuff , forwards he became commissioned , he had already utter at a lower place the police rectitude that he should be honest and be loyal to his province as a security ships officer , in which trigger off of his job is to never swan and report any ill-gotten acts such(prenominal) as intoxicated driving and selling narcotics , and ill fortune to do so allow start out suspension of his endorse . even , the party in surance form _or_ system of government states that the intoxicated people should peck up assistance from the security officers of the party which is a contradiction in terms to the execration that security officers like Tuff had pledged As a person highly valuing his word of honor , he stood for his sworn commitment under the rectitude of nature . Morally discourse , present oppositions for something that is against the law , what he did is just right . that it is similarly clear that the company had to a fault profaned the law by show uping support to extralegal activities such as drunk driving , and this had pushed Tuff to commit his impingement to the company policy . He believed that supporting such illegal actions may cause danger to many people . whatsoever man who is bear on of the public s safety will do the same action he did to show that he is against the company rules believing through and through this bearing the company will change this part of their po liciesOn the new(prenominal) hand consideri! ng the company policy that forbids its employees to reveal to the media well-nigh its policies , Tuff is still guilty . His acts show disloyalty to the company .

But the spoiled question is : is the company cost the loyalty if it supports illegal actions and promptly dismissing one of its employees because of opposing its policies mutually exclusive to the police lawTuff may wee-wee violated the company law but this is due to the illegality that he sees inside the company that he is working for . Looking at his actions from the other side , he had also tried to treasure the company Before he approached the media , he first got in touch with the company officers to show his dissatisfaction of the new policy released by the company . But they didn t listened . He was ignored several clock and his complains were taken for granted . yet , the company had also shortcomings upon cathartic new s because they forgot (whether measuredly or not ) to consider the moral and legal law . If this is an act of disloyalty , he could energize refrain from his job and give out other people about the wrongdoings of the company . But since he was trying to change the company policy in the way he knows , he was also trying to correct...If you want to shrink a full essay, tramp it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper