Chinese words traditionally have been considered uninteresting as objects of morphological investigation because they do not manifest characteristics thought comminuted to the concept morphology (such as fountainhead-formed agreement or morphophonemic and paradigmatic alternation Chinese is peculiarly suited to answer these questions because Chinese word components are relatively easy to isolate , commit and track over timeChinese words exhibit former(a) properties that moldiness be understood if we wish to drag in a universal characterization of words . For example , to what expiration is the concept of bound simmer down - which is important in Chinese - relevant in other languages ? Since Chinese is the world s almost widely spoken language , it is clear that any news report of language that aspires to a claim of universality - including universals of word structure - must take the Chinese data into account . Chinese words have a story to tell about the degree to which words are susceptible to the algorithms of syntax , and whether on that point is a definition of word that works reasonably well across languages . Using Chinese to address these questions is bound to plus our understanding of universal word propertiesOne source of these myths is confusion about the Chinese language itself . then , this study begins with a revue of the language that gave rise to the writing : its typology , characteristics , and some myths of its own perpetrated by scholars who should know offend -- and by others with a political docket who do know better (Maclay Baldwin 1944 Chinese means many things , and we can...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.